I originally had this comment towards the end of this writing, but I suppose I'll put it up front, in the hopes of tempering any anger my opinion might produce.
With my comments, I am in no way saying that volunteer firefighting isn't a good thing. It's a noble cause and should be genuinely recognized as such. Given the limited information I've garnered, a service award isn't the right way to do it. Not for this Town and not in this Time.
From the minutes: "to do away with the program, once it is approved by the voters, it would take another voter referendum, and any changes to the program must also go to a referendum, except for increases or decreases in membership, which is just funded by the annual Town
Budget with either an tax increase or a budget surplus."
Ok - so once it's in place, it'll be in place forever. If the membership rolls rocket up and nearly double from 44 members to 75 (the maximum), the Town - YOU - will pay for it.
Will this program be a carrot with which to attract and retain fire company members? Let's step back a bit and ask the question, does the town have a problem attracting and retaining members? If that's the case, could the Fire Company take some intermediate steps to recruit members?
I'm not great with numbers, so I won't even try to put in numerical terms how many hundreds and hundreds of thousands of Town dollars this program will cost you, your children and your grandchildren. What I will say is that the United States is facing the worst economic downturn in the history of history, and 2009 will not be a good year, financially, for most people. Layoffs and furloughs are already happening. There are entire industries that will not around at the end of 2009. There are people who have jobs today who will not have jobs in a month. I hope I'm wrong, but there are economic indicators that are saying I'm being too optimistic.
The Town of Sardinia is sitting on a literal gold mine with its reserve capital, and to expend those funds into something that will have next-to-zero economic benefit for the town and its people is reckless and wrong. It's wrong. We should be taking some of those ideas from the community meeting in November to figure out how to support local business, energize individual people to invest in the Town, and to muddle through what promises to be a wild economic ride in the near-future. How can we make those dollars work so that a one-dollar expenditure from the reserves produces a three-fold or ten-fold economic benefit? I honestly don't care that this program has been researched for a year or ten years. An ill-conceived notion is still ill-conceived.
I will continue.
The previous public "hearing" on the Award Program consisted of a Fourth-of-July-weekend meeting where, according to the minutes, the only people in attendance were:
Present:
Councilman Ann M. Bean
Councilman Heather M. Phelps
Councilman Norman J. Uhteg
Supervisor Kathleen M. Balus
Absent:
Councilman Ronald L. Kenyon
Also Present:
Damien Ulatowski of Firefighters Benefit & Insurance Services
Donald Brooks of Tomkins Insurance Agencies
Town Clerk Betsy A. Marsh
9 Fire Company Members
An informational meeting consisting of elected officials (including 2 who will directly benefit from this program) + insurance agents (who will directly benefit from this program) + fire company members (who will directly benefit from this program) might equal a fair and open hearing in some alternative universe, or maybe in Stalinist Russia, but not in Sardinia in 2008. Setting aside, for a moment, the General Municipal Law that says it's ok for board members with a financial stake in an Award Program to vote on it, does anyone else see something wrong with this? Just because something is legal doesn't make it right.
A special election for this referendum will cost the Town money. That on its own is not a reason to not have a referendum, but it should make us sit back and consider holding it until the regular November election.
To conclude, questions that should be considered and answered.
- Is the Fire Company willing to have a portion of their financial reserves applied to this program?
- Where is a public record of the Fire Company's finances? Has one been done?
- Does the Town or the Fire Company have projections for membership over the next 10-20 years?
- Has the Town set an "entitlement age" (between 55 and 65 years)? How will this affect membership and payment projections?
- Are service award payments considered taxable income?
- Will the "point system" be audited by any external source? Will that be paid for by the Town? Or will fire fighters self-report their "points"?
- What payments can sitting board members (or their families) expect to receive?
I concede that there are other questions that should be asked. I expect none of these questions to be answered tonight. I expect all of them to be answered by the time a referendum is held.